onlysaneman: Guys, you can't criticize one person's bullshit not-a-Venn-Diagram and then post another. It still makes anyone who knows math's brains hurt.
Hi onlysaneman! Thanks for airing your concerns.
Our math is admittedly rusty, but we’re not sure why this wouldn’t qualify as a valid Venn diagram, given that it describes one member of a set that represents the logical intersection of two greater sets. The proof (again, we’re rusty) is something like this:
It’s logically possible that there are other members of the intersection of A and B, so it might mislead a bit to suggest that Romney’s the only element in the set. But he’s undeniably in it. Right? QED?
